17³Ô¹ÏÍø

Corporate Governance

As of June 24, 2026

Basic Approach

The 17³Ô¹ÏÍø Group Vision is to provide new value to society and solve social issues by enabling "living in health and comfort" and "harmony with the natural environment" under the Group Mission of "contributing to life and living for people around the world." With this as a base, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø aims to contribute to society, achieve sustainable growth, and enhance corporate value over the medium to long term by promoting innovation and creating synergy through integration of various businesses. The 17³Ô¹ÏÍø continues to pursue optimal corporate governance as a framework to make transparent, fair, timely, decisive, and appropriate decision-making in accordance with changes in the business environment.

Basic Policies

1. Securing the Rights and Equal Treatment of Shareholders

While taking proper measures to secure shareholders' rights, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø develops a proper environment for exercise of shareholders' rights including paying attention to foreign shareholders and minority shareholders and providing information necessary for the exercise of rights accurately and in a timely manner.

2. Proper Cooperation with Stakeholders other than Shareholders

The Group Vision of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø is to provide new value to society and solve social issues by enabling "living in health and comfort" and "harmony with the natural environment" for people around the world, and the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø works to facilitate cooperation with its stakeholders.

3. Proper Information Disclosure and Securing of Transparency

The 17³Ô¹ÏÍø, in addition to disclosure required by laws and regulations, actively provides information to various stakeholders including financial information such as financial position and operating results, management strategy/issues, and non-financial information concerning risks and governance, etc.

4. Responsibilities of the Board of Directors

In order to achieve sustainable growth, enhance medium to long term corporate value, and increase earnings ability and capital efficiency, the Board of Directors of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø presents the overall direction of its management strategy, develops an environment to support risk-taking by the management, and effectively oversees the business management of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø from an independent and objective standpoint, based on the fiduciary responsibility and accountability to shareholders.

5. Dialog with Shareholders

The 17³Ô¹ÏÍø develops a system to have a constructive dialog with shareholders/investors and actively promotes such dialog.

Corporate Governance Framework

Corporate governance configuration

Meetings of Board of Directors, Advisory Committees, and Audit & Supervisory Board (fiscal 2025)

No. of meetings held Average attendance Main subjects of agenda
Board of Directors 15 100%
(Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members)
  • Business portfolio transformation and enhancement of corporate value
  • Examinations, decisions, and follow-up of growth investments, M&A, structural transformation, and carve-outs
  • Reports of the group-wide risk management status
  • Reports of dialogue with investors
  • Sustainability initiatives and disclosure
  • Reports of Nomination and Remuneration Advisory Committees
Nomination Advisory Committee* 6 100%
(all members)
  • Composition and size of the Board of Directors
  • Officer nomination process and selection criteria
  • Nomination of officers for fiscal 2026
  • Succession plan for the President
Remuneration Advisory Committee* 4 100%
(all members)
  • Review and deliberation of the officer remuneration system
  • Decision on individual performance-linked remuneration amounts
Audit & Supervisory Board 34 99%
(Audit & Supervisory Board Members)
  • Review of the discussion points and key considerations at the Board of Directors
  • Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Audit & Supervisory Board
  • Opinion exchange sessions with Outside Directors
  • Information sharing and opinion exchange sessions with the internal audit division, the Corporate Auditors of subsidiaries, and the auditing firm
  • * The Nomination Advisory Committee and Remuneration Advisory Committee are comprised of the 4 Outside Directors and Chairman & Director Hideki Kobori and President & Representative Director Koshiro Kudo as members, with the Nomination Advisory Committee chaired by Outside Director Hiroyuki Ogawa and the Remuneration Advisory Committee chaired by Outside Director Yoshinori Yamashita.

Policy and Procedures to Nominate Candidates for Directors

In selecting candidates for Directors, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø chooses persons with deep insight and excellent skills suitable for Directors. For inside Directors, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø chooses those with expertise, experience and skills in the required field as candidates. Meanwhile, for Outside Directors, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø chooses as candidates corporate executives, academic experts, and former civil servants with abundant experience, expecting objective oversight of management based on their deep insight.
To further increase the objectivity and transparency of the nomination of candidates for Directors, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø has established the Nomination Advisory Committee whose members mainly comprise outside Directors. This committee is involved in the examination of the composition and size of the Board of Directors and the nomination policy for officers and provides advice.

Diversity of Expertise and Experience of Directors/Audit & Supervisory Board Members (Skills Matrix)

In order to ¡°contribute to life and living for people around the world,¡± the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø pursues two aspects of sustainability: ¡°contributing to a sustainable society¡± and ¡°sustainable increase in corporate value.¡± To this end, we have identified the knowledge, experience, and capabilities required to advance Group management and its supervision and auditing at a higher level in a discontinuous and uncertain business environment, and have considered the composition of the Board of Directors with consideration to the balance of its diversity and independence.
Specifically, in addition to ¡°corporate management and strategy,¡± ¡°finance and accounting,¡± ¡°legal affairs, intellectual property, and risk management,¡± and ¡°R&D, manufacturing, and technology,¡± which are indispensable for pursuing opportunities and reducing risks, we also emphasize ¡°global¡± to align with the internationalization of markets and businesses, ¡°digital¡± to advance digital transformation, ¡°environment and society¡± to respond to changes in the social environment and the status of stakeholders with agility, and ¡°human resource management¡± to utilize people as the foundation of business management.

Skills Directors
Hideki Kobori Koshiro Kudo Toshiyasu Horie Masatsugu Kawase Yuko Maeda Chieko Matsuda Yoshinori Yamashita Hiroyuki Ogawa
        I I I I
Corporate Management (experience as President of a listed company) ¡ñ ¡ñ         ¡ñ ¡ñ
  Management Strategy, Organization Operation         ¡ñ     ¡ñ        
Finance, Accounting ¡ñ     ¡ñ
Sustainability ¡ñ ¡ñ ¡ñ ¡ñ
Global Businesses ¡ñ      
R&D, Innovation, DX   ¡ñ ¡ñ  
Manufacturing & Quality Assurance   ¡ñ ¡ñ  
Human Resources, DE&I     ¡ñ ¡ñ
Legal Affairs, Risk Management        
Skills Audit & Supervisory Board Members
Takuya Magara Hiroki Ideguchi Akemi Mochizuki Haruyuki Urata Yoshikazu Ochiai
    I I I
Corporate Management (experience as President of a listed company)          
  Management Strategy, Organization Operation   ¡ñ   ¡ñ  
Finance, Accounting   ¡ñ ¡ñ ¡ñ  
Sustainability ¡ñ        
Global Businesses       ¡ñ ¡ñ
R&D, Innovation, DX ¡ñ        
Manufacturing & Quality Assurance ¡ñ        
Human Resources, DE&I   ¡ñ      
Legal Affairs, Risk Management   ¡ñ ¡ñ   ¡ñ
(Notes) 1
The above table indicates up to four major skills for each individual and does not represent all of their skills.
2
¡°Corporate Management (experience as President of a listed company)¡± is positioned as broad and diverse experience,
including elements of other skills listed in the above table.
Skills Reasons and details of skill selection
Corporate Management (experience as President of a listed company) In light of the management environment of the Group which is accelerating business portfolio transformation, the selection was made because outstanding leadership and diverse experience as the head of a listed company are necessary.
  Management Strategy, Organization Operation Selected the experience and expertise in planning and executing management strategies, managing large-sized organizations, etc., since they are necessary for supervising management strategy, which is the main agenda for the Board of Directors of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø.
Finance, Accounting Selected the experience and expertise in planning and executing capital policy and capital allocation, and accounting insights, etc., since they are necessary for business portfolio transformation and management aiming for capital efficiency.
Sustainability Selected the experience and expertise in supervising sustainability issues at the management level, including carbon neutrality, circular economy, and dealing with human rights, which are core subjects of management strategy.
Global Businesses Selected the experience and expertise in leading or supervising international operations, including managing in the global business environment and promoting overseas business operations, since the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø has numerous overseas sites and is strengthening its expansion into global markets.
R&D, Innovation, DX R&D, innovation, and DX are the source of the Group¡¯s sustainable growth. The experience and expertise in these fields were selected since they are necessary for creating value through them and preventing damage by using cybersecurity, etc.
Manufacturing & Quality Assurance Selected the experience and expertise in manufacturing technology, quality assurance, and safety technology since they are essential to the Group¡¯s business execution.
Human Resources, DE&I Selected the experience and expertise in this field to create innovations and businesses as well as to promote the active participation and growth of human resources by planning and executing human resources measures aligned with the management strategies and promoting diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I).
Legal Affairs, Risk Management Selected the experience and expertise in the legal field, compliance and insights, etc. on risk management, since they are essential to the Group¡¯s sustainable growth and prevention of damage.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø conducts regular evaluations of its own effectiveness every fiscal year. The results of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors (hereinafter, ¡°the fiscal year¡¯s evaluation¡±) in fiscal 2025 are summarized as follows. In order to maintain an evaluation cycle that also incorporates an objective perspective, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø will continue to use the third-party organization on a regular basis for evaluating the effectiveness of the Board of Directors.

1. Process of the fiscal year¡¯s Evaluation

  • (1)December 2025
    The 17³Ô¹ÏÍø¡¯s Board of Directors deliberated on the process and survey content of the fiscal year¡¯s evaluation.
  • (2)From December 2025 to January 2026
    Survey of all Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members was conducted. The survey covered the Board of Directors, the Nomination Advisory Committee, and the Remuneration Advisory Committee (hereinafter ¡°covered bodies¡±). The survey topics included the functions, operation and discussion status of the covered bodies, and individual evaluation (self-evaluation) of all Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members. In this fiscal year¡¯s survey, in order to further enhance the supervisory function, both the exercise of the supervisory function of the Board of Directors as a whole and individual contributions to the exercise of the supervisory function were evaluated.
  • (3)March and April 2026
    The 17³Ô¹ÏÍø¡¯s Board of Directors confirmed the results of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors based on the survey results above, and deliberated on responses to the issues identified.

2. Summary of results of the evaluation

  • (1)The 17³Ô¹ÏÍø¡¯s Board of Directors confirmed that the effectiveness of the Board of Directors is sufficiently ensured, particularly in the following aspects.
    • The Board of Directors was evaluated for advancing agenda-setting on business portfolio transformation (growth investments and structural transformation) with a view to 2030, enriching the quality and quantity of discussions, and deepening overall discussions on management issues from a medium- to long-term perspective.
    • The Board of Directors was evaluated for appropriately incorporating the perspectives of capital markets and other stakeholders on key management issues to conduct in-depth discussions, as well as for deepening monitoring discussions from a risk perspective, including IT security risks.
    • In operational aspects, the Board of Directors was highly evaluated for frank exchanges of critical opinions that contribute to enhancing corporate value, and for maintaining an open environment that encourages active discussion and makes it easy for Outside Officers to speak.
  • (2)On the other hand, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø¡¯s Board of Directors shared that there are still issues regarding the following points.
    • The Board of Directors recognizes the need to place greater emphasis on discussions of medium- to long-term future strategy for sustainable enhancement of corporate value, to further enrich discussions on the evolution of sector management, and to deepen consideration from multiple perspectives and add depth to discussions from the perspective of capital markets.
    • Regarding raising the quality of discussions by the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors recognizes the need to make effective use of off-site settings to deepen discussions on medium- to long-term strategic subjects and to further promote Outside Officers¡¯ understanding of the businesses.
    • Regarding the Nomination Advisory Committee, the Board of Directors recognizes the need to consider further enhancement of the operation of the succession plan for the President & CEO. Regarding the Remuneration Advisory Committee, the Board of Directors recognizes the need to advance consideration toward the revision of the next officer remuneration system.

3. PDCA cycle of evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors and future measures

Plan:
Direction of measures for fiscal 2025
Do:
Primary measures during fiscal 2025
Check:
Evaluation for the fiscal year
Act:
Future measures
  • ¡öBoard of Directors
Deliberation subjects/deliberation quality
  • ¡öFurther enhance discussions from a medium- to long-term perspective on the future vision of the Group after business portfolio transformation, sustainability issues, etc., and deepen discussions on management
  • ¡öAim to further raise the quality of discussions from the perspective of capital markets by increasing opportunities for opinion exchange between Outside Directors and management on topics for dialogue with investors
  • ¡öDeliberate on the annual agenda at the Board of Directors. Subjects related to enhancing corporate value, such as measures for enhancing corporate value and sustainability, are continuously deliberated
  • ¡öDiscuss the future vision of key growth businesses in the Material sector, also utilizing off-site settings
  • ¡öExchange opinions with Outside Directors constructively in off-site settings prior to small meetings with institutional investors
  • ¡öHighly evaluated on the advancement of agenda-setting on business portfolio transformation and discussions from a medium- to long-term perspective
  • ¡öSubjects were identified that need to be deliberated more intensively, including the future strategy of NEXT 17³Ô¹ÏÍø, and responses to changes in the management environment, in order to sustainably enhance corporate value
  • ¡öRegarding discussions from the perspective of capital markets, it was pointed out that there is a need to further deepen discussions on the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø¡¯s unique value creation across diverse business operations and the technology aspect of growth strategy
  • (1)Agenda-setting that contributes to sustainable enhancement of corporate value
  • ¡öAt the Board of Directors and other meetings, further enrich discussions on the Group¡¯s future strategy by discussing not only NEXT 17³Ô¹ÏÍø and the future vision of each sector and resource allocation based on these, but also the management platform that supports growth
  • ¡öContinue to work toward maximizing corporate value by expanding discussions from the perspective of technology and innovation in deliberations on measures to enhance corporate value
Operation
  • ¡öSecure time for deliberation on key management issues by rationally narrowing down the Board of Directors¡¯ agenda items. Improve the effectiveness of deliberations by enhancing information sharing through effective utilization of off-site settings
  • ¡öThe Board of Directors Secretariat worked closely with the Chairman to establish an agenda schedule that rationally consolidates deliberations. Through appropriate time allocation, deepened discussions on key management issues
  • ¡öStatus of operation was evaluated as appropriate due to steady operational improvements
  • ¡öIt was pointed out that, toward raising the quality of discussions, the effective utilization of off-site settings is also important for sharing the premises of discussions, such as the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø¡¯s corporate culture
  • (2)Operational improvements to raise the quality of discussions at the Board of Directors
  • ¡öEnhance the effectiveness of deliberations at the Board of Directors through continuous operational improvements, such as optimizing the utilization of off-site settings and improving the format of materials
  • ¡öNomination and Remuneration Advisory Committees
  • ¡öEnhance the operation of both advisory committees to further deepen deliberations on the Board of Directors composition, succession, and officer remuneration. In addition, enhance the content of information sharing with the Board of Directors
  • ¡öDeliberate on the matters listed on the left at the Nomination Advisory Committee. After the June 2026 General Meeting of Shareholders, Outside Directors will constitute half of the Board of Directors
  • ¡öOfficer remuneration was revised to further enhance incentives for improving corporate value
  • ¡öBoth advisory committees are evaluated as functioning appropriately. Information sharing with the Board of Directors was also highly evaluated
  • ¡öThe progress of the succession plan is regularly confirmed at the Nomination Advisory Committee. Based on this, suggestions were provided toward further enhancement of operation
  • (3)Initiatives toward deepening discussions at the Nomination and Remuneration Advisory Committees
  • ¡öContinue to examine ways to enhance the operation of the succession plan. In addition, deepen consideration of the optimal officer remuneration system for enhancing corporate value, with a view to the next revision

Remuneration of Directors

Note: Percentages shown for Directors who have executive responsibilities (FY2025)

Basic remuneration Performance-linked monetary remuneration Stock-based remuneration
42.2% 29.7% 28.1%
  • Performance-linked monetary remuneration ¡ú commitment to results
  • Stock-based remuneration ¡ú sharing the perspective with shareholders
  • (Note)   Outside Directors receive basic remuneration only

The amount of remuneration, etc. of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members in fiscal 2025

Classification Amount Paid (? million) Breakdown by remuneration type (? million) Number of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members Paid
Basic remuneration Performance-linked monetary remuneration Stock-based remuneration
Directors 744 455 151 139 10
¡¡(of which Outside Directors) 81 81 £­ £­ 4
Audit & Supervisory Board Members 169 169 £­ £­ 6
¡¡(of which Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members) 61 61 £­ £­ 3
Total 913 624 151 139 16
  • (Note)   In this table, ¡°Stock-based remuneration¡± represents an amount expected to be charged for the next fiscal year, not an amount that was charged for the fiscal year under review. The 17³Ô¹ÏÍø charges the stock-based remuneration on a day when points are conferred based on the Share Grant Regulations. The point conferment date is set to a day in the next fiscal year of the fiscal year in which the target achievement base date for the points (the final day of the fiscal year) exists.

Policy on Determining Remuneration Amounts and Calculation Methods

As one of the corporate governance mechanisms to ensure that the Group can achieve sustainable growth and enhance corporate value over the medium to long term, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø has sought advice of the Remuneration Advisory Committee on the decision-making policy pertaining to the contents of remuneration, etc. for individual Directors (hereinafter, the "Decision-making Policy"). Respecting the contents of the reports thereof, the Board of Directors has made a resolution on the Decision-making Policy as follows.
The remuneration for Audit & Supervisory Board Members consists of fixed remuneration, since the performance-linked remuneration system is not applied in the remuneration for them. Individual remuneration amounts are determined through discussions with Audit & Supervisory Board Members.

Policy for Determining Director Remuneration

  • 1. Basic policy
    The Directors¡¯ remuneration of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø is one of the important components of corporate governance. The 17³Ô¹ÏÍø designs this system to provide appropriate incentives to both executives and supervisors for achieving sustainable growth and improving medium- to long-term corporate value.
    Remuneration for Non-executive Directors* including Outside Directors, who supervise the management of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø, is comprised solely of fixed basic remuneration at a level determined in consideration of third-party survey data, in order to secure a high degree of independence unaffected by earnings fluctuations.
    The remuneration for Executive Directors combines performance-linked monetary remuneration with stock-based remuneration as nonmonetary remuneration, in addition to fixed basic remuneration, in order to provide incentives tied to earnings and management strategy as senior management, with levels of remuneration amounts and proportions of types of remuneration adjusted as appropriate for each role according to management strategy and tasks, in consideration of third-party survey data.
    To ensure the optimal way of remunerating Directors and design of the remuneration system, the Board of Directors and the Remuneration Advisory Committee regularly deliberate and continually confirm their appropriateness and make improvements.
  • 2. Policy for determining the timing for payment and conditions of remuneration
    Basic remuneration and performance-linked monetary remuneration are paid monthly. For stock-based remuneration, points described below are granted to eligible Directors on a certain date each fiscal year set forth in the Share Grant Regulations determined by the Board of Directors, and shares of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø are provided to eligible Directors at the time they retire both as Director and as officer of the Group in light of the purpose of the stock-based remuneration to share the medium- to long-term perspectives of shareholders.
  • 3. Policy for determining each individual¡¯s basic remuneration (monetary remuneration)
    Amounts of basic remuneration for Directors are determined through comprehensive consideration in accordance with rank and responsibility taking account of other companies¡¯ levels of remuneration and the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø¡¯s earnings.
  • 4. Policy for determining content of performance-linked monetary remuneration and nonmonetary remuneration as well as method of calculating amounts and numbers thereof
    Performance-linked monetary remuneration, which comprises a part of remuneration for Executive Directors, combines both achievement of financial targets including invested capital efficiency with achievement of non-financial targets including individual targets such as progress on sustainability, so as to provide incentives tied to earnings and management strategy as senior management.
    Performance-linked monetary remuneration is calculated based on a comprehensive judgment on the basis of achievement of financial targets such as operating income, ROIC, etc., together with achievement of individually set targets including progress on sustainability. Standards for financial incentives are selected as appropriate for clear and objective evaluation based on earnings results together with the perspective of awareness for improving invested capital efficiency.
    The formula required to calculate individual performance-linked monetary remuneration is outlined as follows.

    [Formula required to calculate individual performance-linked monetary remuneration]

    • Index calculated by evaluation* x basic amount by rank = Individual performance-linked monetary remuneration * Coefficient comprehensively considering achievement of financial targets and nonfinancial targets

    A portion of remuneration for Executive Directors is the provision of stock-based remuneration as non-monetary remuneration. To share with shareholders not only the benefits of share price increases but also the risk associated with share price decreases, a stock-based remuneration system was adopted, whereby a trust established by the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø acquires shares of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø and grants them to eligible Directors. Based on the Share Grant Regulations adopted by the Board of Directors, eligible Directors are granted points linked to achievement of targets set by the medium-term management plan in accordance with their rank, etc. (maximum of 150,000 points per fiscal year) and the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø¡¯s shares are granted to eligible Directors corresponding to the accumulated number of points at the time of their retirement as Director and as officer of the Group (the number of shares to be granted is the number of points granted multiplied by 1.).

  • 5. Policy for determining the proportion of basic remuneration, performance-linked monetary remuneration, and nonmonetary remuneration for individual Executive Directors
    The proportion of basic remuneration, performance-linked monetary remuneration, and stock-based remuneration for each Executive Director is determined to provide an appropriate incentive in accordance with management strategy and management tasks, with consideration given to the level obtained from third-party survey data.
    The proportion of basic remuneration, performance-linked monetary remuneration, and stock-based remuneration for each Executive Director is generally 4:3:3, with performance-linked monetary remuneration ranging between 0% to 200% of the base amount based on rank, according to evaluation. However, the Board of Directors and the Remuneration Advisory Committee regularly deliberate on its appropriateness, and improvement is made based on continual confirmation of appropriateness.
  • 6. Policy for determining items to be entrusted regarding determination of content of remuneration of individual Directors and for determining content of remuneration of individual Directors
    Among remuneration of each individual Director, determination of the amount of performance-linked monetary remuneration is entrusted to the Remuneration Advisory Committee based on a resolution of the Board of Directors, with the Remuneration Advisory Committee being authorized to confirm the reasonableness and appropriateness of the evaluation of the achievement of targets by each Executive Director as proposed by the President and Director, and to determine performance-linked monetary remuneration amounts for individual Directors by applying this evaluation to the formula determined by the Board of Directors.
    To ensure that such authority is properly exercised, Outside Directors comprise a majority of the Remuneration Advisory Committee, and it regularly reports to the Board of Directors on the process of the above confirmation and determination.
    Regarding determination of basic remuneration and stock-based remuneration for individual Directors, the Board of Directors requests deliberation by the Remuneration Advisory Committee and makes a determination based on ample consideration of the result of deliberation by the Remuneration Advisory Committee.
    Fixed basic remuneration by rank is paid upon determination of the amount by the Board of the Directors. Stock-based remuneration is granted to eligible Directors when certain conditions are met, corresponding to points granted to each Director based on the Share Grant Regulations adopted by the Board of Directors.
  • 7. Important matters for determining the content of individual remuneration, etc. for Directors
    In the event that a Director who is eligible for payment of stock-based remuneration, which is nonmonetary remuneration, as part of the above-stated remuneration for Executive Directors, retires due to personal reasons (except in cases where it is determined that the resignation is due to unavoidable circumstances), and in the event that a Director is dismissed or resigns due to causing loss or damage to the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø¡¯s group companies as defined in the Share Grant Regulations, etc., all or some of the points granted up to that point shall be forfeited and no shares of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø corresponding to the forfeited points shall be granted, or no further points shall be granted, based on a resolution of the Board of Directors.
  • *Non-executive Directors include the Chairman & Director.

Independence Standards and Qualification for Outside Directors/Audit & Supervisory Board Members

In determining that Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members are independent, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø ensures that they do not correspond to any of the following and that they are capable of performing their duties from a fair and neutral standpoint.

  • 1. A person who currently executes or has executed businesses of the Group (Executive Directors, Executive Officers, employees, etc.) over the last 10 years
  • 2.A company or a person who executes the businesses thereof whose major business partner is the Group (a company or a person with more than 2% of its annual consolidated net sales coming from the Group)
  • 3. A major business partner of the Group (when payments by this partner to the Group account for more than 2% of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø's annual consolidated net sales or when the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø borrows money from such partner amounting to more than 2% of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø's consolidated total assets) or a person who executes the businesses thereof
  • 4. A person who receives a large amount of money or other financial gain (?10 million or more in one year) from the Group as an individual other than remuneration for being a Director/Audit & Supervisory Board Member of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø
  • 5. A company which receives a large amount of donations or aid (?10 million or more in one year) from the Group or a person who executes the businesses thereof
  • 6. A main shareholder of the Group (a person/company who directly or indirectly owns 10% or more of all voting rights of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø) or a person who executes the businesses thereof
  • 7. A person who executes the businesses of a company which elects Directors/Audit & Supervisory Board Members/employees of the Group as Directors/Audit & Supervisory Board Members
  • 8. An Independent Auditor of the Group or any staff thereof
  • 9. A person who has fallen into any of the categories 2 through 8 above over the last three years
  • 10.A person who is a close relative (spouse, relative within the second degree of kinship, or those with whom they share living expenses) of a person who falls under any of the categories 1 through 8 above, provided that ¡°a person who executes businesses thereof¡± in 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 above shall be replaced with ¡°an important person who executes the businesses thereof (Executive Directors and Executive Officer, etc.)¡±
  • 11. A person who has served as Outside Director or Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member of the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø for more than eight years in total.

Status of Audits by Audit & Supervisory Board Members, Financial Audits and Internal Audits

  • For internal audits of business execution, the company has established an Internal Audit Department, reporting directly to the President. The Internal Audit Department formulates an annual audit plan according to the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø's Basic Regulation for Internal Audits, and conducts an audit of the Group under the approval of the President.
  • As for audits by Audit & Supervisory Board Members, each Audit & Supervisory Board Member audits the execution of duties of Directors by attending meetings of the Board of Directors and examining the status of execution of operations based on the audit policy stipulated by Audit & Supervisory Board. To support the function of the Audit & Supervisory Board, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø has established an Audit & Supervisory Board Members Office.
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers Japan LLC is contracted as the Independent Auditors to perform financial audits according to the Companies Act and Financial Instruments and Exchange Act.
  • Mutual cooperation between the Internal Audit Department, Audit & Supervisory Board, and Independent Auditors is reinforced through periodic liaison meetings of the Internal Audit Department, Audit & Supervisory Board, and Corporate Auditors of core operating companies, etc. During these meetings, the effectiveness of the Group's internal control system for legal compliance and risk management is reviewed. In addition, the Audit & Supervisory Board confirms the audit plan with the Independent Auditors and receives reports of the results of audits on the Group at the end of the quarterly consolidated accounting period and at the end of the annual consolidated accounting period.

Strategic Shareholdings

The 17³Ô¹ÏÍø is continuing to reduce its holdings of shares held for purposes other than pure investment (strategic shareholdings), taking into consideration factors such as the risk of share price fluctuations, costs associated with such holdings, and capital efficiency.
The purpose, effectiveness and economic rationale of individual strategic shareholdings are regularly evaluated from qualitative and quantitative aspects each year, and are reviewed by the Board of Directors. As a result of the verification, the 17³Ô¹ÏÍø reduces, through sales or other means, holdings of shares judged to be no longer compatible with the purpose of holding them or deemed to have costs and risks that outweigh the benefits of holding them, taking into consideration the conditions of the company concerned.